Leila Khaled, the first female hijacker.
Some things that might tickle your fancy. *All information is accurate as far as I'm aware (as of the date shown).
22 January 2024
Lady Hijacker
Harold Shipman
Dr. Harold Shipman (Dr. Death)
Harold Shipman was an English general practitioner. With an estimated 250 victims, he is considered to be one of the most prolific serial killers in modern history. In January 2000, he was found guilty of murdering 15 patients under his care and sentenced to life imprisonment, with a whole life order. In the UK, under a “life sentence” prisoners are eligible for early release after a minimum term set by the judge. 4 years later, Shipman hanged himself in his cell at HMP Wakefield.
“The Shipman Enquiry” revealed the extent of his crimes and had far reaching consequences for the NHS primary care services. Victims were vulnerable elderly patients of his, who trusted their doctor. He would administer a single fatal dose of drugs (typically morphine or diamorphine) or prescribe excessive quantities of medicines. Shipman was reputedly very close to his mother who developed lung cancer. A doctor administered morphine to her at home where a 17 year old Shipman saw her pain subside, until her death.
Just a year after taking his first position in general practice, Shipman was fined £600 after being caught forging prescriptions of pethidine for himself. In 1993 he established his own surgery, earning himself a position of respect in the community. When concerns were expressed about the high rate of death amongst his patients, especially the high number of cremation forms for elderly women, insufficient evidence led to police closing the investigation. Shipman took a further 3 lives before the daughter of his final victim raised the alarm. Police began investigating after she told how she and her children were excluded from her mother's will, while Shipman was set to inherit £386,000. An exhumation revealed traces of diamorphine in the deceased woman, to which the doctor responded by alleging she had been an addict. Records he showed as evidence of his claims were found to have been made following her death.
Following his arrest in September 1998, a typewriter owned by Shipman was identified as that used to make the forged will. Of the deaths Shipman had certified, 15 specimen cases would be investigated, exposing a pattern of his administering lethal doses of diamorphine, signing death certificates then falsifying records to detail their failing health. A lengthy trial ended with guilty verdicts and 15 life sentences, for which he joined 600 of Britain's most high profile criminals at the maximum security facility known as “monster mansion”.
It's suspected his suicide was intended to assure his wife's entitlement to an NHS pension and with it her financial security. A year later, Shipman was quietly cremated outside normal working hours, attended by only his wife and four children. The inquiry concluded he had killed at least 218 patients between 1977 and 1998. During this time 459 of his patients died but there was no way to ascertain his culpability, leaving his final victim count at 250 over the 27 year period. £10,000 worth of jewellery was retrieved from Shipman's garage, much of which he is believed to have stolen from his victims. A memorial garden called “The garden of Tranquility” lies within Hyde park.
Changes in standard medical procedure in the UK is referred to as the “Shipman effect”. Wary of over-prescribing, changes in dispensing practices have led to many patients struggling with getting adequate pain medication. Single doctor general practices became a thing of the past, replaced by large multiple-doctor surgeries increasing the oversight of decisions. Organising a cremation now requires confirmation that a violent or unnatural death isn't suspected and that further examination of remains is not warranted.
For several years, I lived in the shadow of HMP Wakefield, right next to the country's most dangerous murderers, sex offenders and paedophiles. 25 foot high walls, floodlights, barbed wire, electric fences, CCTV cameras and prison service dog-handlers patrol the perimeter 24/7 circling Victorian institution. The sound from a weekly Sunday football match makes the otherwise tomb-like silence more noticeable. Our house sat amid a small terrace, originally built to accommodate the prison guards and their families. Contrary to popular opinion, there are few places as safe to live. Only one escapee has ever made it through the intense security. In 1959, IRA prisoner Sèamus Murphy was the only one of five heading over the wall, to be successful. Numerous people colluded to bring the plan to fruition. But today, many of those detained and their heinous crimes are known by the public, who would be far less sympathetic and prepared to assist them.
It's rumoured that a number of Shipman's fellow inmate's sought medical advice from him, of which at least two ended up seriously ill in the infirmary. Even if someone tries to kill you in prison, nobody talks about it to authorities. Amongst those condemned to pass their sentences there are:
*Klaus Fuchs. German spy.
*Ian Huntley. Child murderer.
"Colin Ireland. Serial killer.
*Ian Watkins. Lost Prophets.
*Levi Bellfield. Serial killer.
*Robert Black. Child murderer.
*Mark Bridger. Child murderer.
*Charles Bronson. Most violent.
*Robert Maudsley. Cannibal.
*Jeremy Bamber. Murderer.
*Damien Kendall. Murderer.
*Kamel Bourgass. Police murder
*Sidney Cooke. Serial child killer
*John Cooper. Serial killer
*Jordan Monaghan. Murderer.
*Mick Philpott. Child murderer
*Jack Renshaw. Paedophile.
*Reinhard Sinaga. Serial rapist
*Radislav Krstiç. War crimes.
*Michael Sam's. Murderer.
When murder comes to town
A murderer in our midst.
Attractive brown eyed blonde Wendy, had handed in her notice at work where she was an office receptionist. A for sale sign hung from the front of her end terraced house, a ten minute walk from the city centre. Her plan to relocate near to her newly-married daughter in Essex, was well and truly coming together. But within minutes of arriving home on Tuesday March 15th, 1994, Wendy was sexually assaulted and then savagely stabbed to death. Such was the terror that gripped the city, before long the faceless killer acquired the name "The Executioner of Wakefield". Despite being situated in the shadow of maximum security HMP Wakefield, local people believed it to be a safe and friendly place to live. As stunned as we were, the world keeps on turning. Yorkshire people are renowned for their grit and it was needed now more than ever. Yet when reaching home, an eerie reticence compelled us to look over our shoulders.
Wakefield is technically a city, but as it is in many smaller Yorkshire communities, neighbours stop to talk to one another, and a stranger was just a friend you hadn't met yet. Pit closures that decimated mining communities over the past decade had brought the people of Wakefield closer together, united by their struggles. Working men's clubs remained popular, members only establishments that offered live entertainment, Bingo, cut priced alcohol and Outings for children and the elderly. The immediate theory that Wendy's killer lived in the locality, shook the enduring sense of solidarity as nothing else had yet done.
![]() |
| Wendy's house was next to a pub, but a driveway lay between them, giving access to the rear of her property. |
- "I just saw her get off the bus as I was getting off another bus"
- "I had been.... thinking how crap my life was. My sex life...was absolute zero and I had a lot of upset and anger towards my girlfriend."
- "I decided to do something that day to kill someone. I just wanted someone to suffer the same way I was feeling".
His cold statement was: "I'm a rapist who killed, I'm not a murderer who raped."
Mr. Justice Moorland ordered that Farrow must serve a minimum of 18 years in prison, for the rape, sexual assault and murder of Wendy. He received an additional four year term for the attempted burglary of another woman in November. But the judge added he would recommend Farrow remains in custody for "very, very many years."
She said:"They don't send people to an open prison if they don't want to release them at some point. The parole board report praised him for how well he had done and how his risk areas had been reduced."
"I think he is a dangerous, dangerous man. People need to be reminded of what he has done. Particularly people in Leeds and Wakefield if he is going to move back there."
"Farrow has never shown any remorse," she said. "He took a pair of my mother's shoes as a murder trophy and has never revealed where he has hidden them. He obviously has a thirst for more as he was out stalking and attempting to get women on their own in their homes within weeks of murdering my lovely mum. In my opinion, this man could have been the next Yorkshire ripper."
New parole board rules in the UK mean it's possible for public parole hearings to be held in some cases where it's in the interest of justice. The normal position is for parole hearings to remain in private. It's critical that witnesses are able to give their best evidence in an environment where open and honest discussion can take place. Each application will be considered, with representation sought from all parties to the case. The chair of the parole board will decide whether applications will be accepted or rejected. Those decisions are posted on the government website.
Ms Millington-Jones has attended every session during which the parole board has been discussing Farrow, the degree of risk he presents and ultimately, decide if he can be released. She submitted an application requesting that the 2023 parole hearing be held in public, due to the serious danger she maintains he presents to the public. Farrow's lawyers objected, claiming that it would prevent him from receiving a fair hearing. Farrow said he would refuse to give evidence in public and it was claimed that he "may experience unnecessary stress", should the case being held in public. Although they declared the concerns of Farrow and his lawyers insufficient to impede the process, the chair of the parole board determined the hearing would take place in private.
Retired Det. Chief Supt. Paul Johnston has expressed his concerns, about the possibility of a parole board decision that could see Farrow back in the community. He said "There has been no explanation, no apology, no remorse." While he's deeply concerned, he appreciates that the parole board have a difficult task. He remarked that:
"Decisions have to be based on risk- risk of the murderer re-offending in some way, shape or form. That risk is often judged by remorse that has been showed, by explanations as to why he did what he did. If I am right, there has been nothing of that nature from him over the last 18 years, I would have to ask what basis can someone say this is a changed man? What's to say this won't happen again?"
Police said from the time he was locked up, that he would have become a prolific serial killer had he not been caught. The former officer who had led the hunt for Barrow warns "I genuinely believe he poses a significant risk to women if he is released."
R.I.P. Wendy. Wakefield remembers you with love.
~
20 January 2024
suicide plane crash
08 January 2023
The nightmare pill
Wednesday 8th March 2023
The nightmare pill.
Have you ever had one of those dreams where you know a terrible disaster is imminent, but you either can't tell anyone or they just won't listen? Well, this has been my life for the past twenty years or so. Yes, it's bizarre and no doubt, it sounds like I'm being overly dramatic. I probably wouldn't have believed me either.
Despite being marketed as a "safer" option than benzodiazepines for the treatment of insomnia, none of these medicines are intended for long term use. Prescribing medical practitioners are advised to limit their patient's use of the drug to a maximum of 14-28 days. All these medicines prevent the patient from obtaining complete sleep cycles, with their rhythm oscillating between slow-wave and REM phases of sleep. Such a deficit impedes regeneration of the immune system and the cognitive abilities of the brain to retain thoughts and memories, among other vital functions. Consequently, sleep obtained by taking such medicines, is little better than none at all.
![]() |
| https://thoughtcatalog.com/eric-redding/2016/01/44-people-share-their-crazy-and-dangerous-ambien-horror-stories/ |
Irrespective of prescribing guidelines advising doctors, countless patients take these drugs on a daily basis for years on end, having become hopelessly addicted after years of use. It's impossible that they can be getting anything but relief from withdrawal symptoms (which admittedly does feel good) and a psychosomatic effect , given the tolerance they must have acquired. Ironically, withdrawal symptoms can be so severe that benzodiazepines are needed to assist with tapering, reduction and the management of potential seizures. Incidences of over prescribing have continued increasing in frequency alongside a staggering popularity for recreational use.
Although the number of people addicted to Z drugs is significant, it's not the biggest concern users should be aware of. Pharmacies are legally obliged to clarify the many side effects that can befall patients. Warnings in the UK mainly consist of verbal advise from doctors and pharmacists, whilst in the US, black box warnings and many times the size of the packaging itself. They describe all the usual unpleasantness associated with hypnotics, but one specific peculiarity has been intentionally suppressed since its inception. One that everyone, whether they take the drug or not, needs to be keenly aware of.
It's impossible to suggest that I misused this drug in any way. I used it no more than two nights out of seven. Upon those occasions, I took a single 7.5mg pill, as prescribed, without any alcohol or any other possibly contra-indicated substance. To the best of my knowledge, I had experienced a fairly good night's sleep, waking feeling normal with nothing out of the ordinary to report. Then, one morning a friend of my then partner, knocked on my door. Thinking nothing of it, I opened the door and invited him inside. Before I could close the door behind him..BAM! He punched me square in the face. Now, I can take a punch, so my response was a combination of shock and confusion. I'm a very agreeable person. Definitely not the kind of person who has angered a queue avengers waiting for their turn to hit me.
Raised voices, accusations and denials ensued. Apparently, I had called his GF numerous times during the night, making increasingly severe threats. Calls made to someone I had never met, but yet even more baffling - how did I even know her phone number? I simply couldn't believe this was a behaviour I was capable of and still struggle to believe it to this day.
When he played me a recording of the calls, hearing my voice like that I was forced to admit my guilt. There was absolutely no denying it was my voice, but why or how it occurred was and still is, inconceivable.
Before too long I discovered from talking to friends, that these sort of bizarre incidents in conjunction with the memory loss, while under the influence of Zopiclone, were more common than we could have imagined. The common characteristics in all occasions were:
💊The use of a single 7.5mg dose of Zopiclone.
💊Behaviour out of character to the individual.
💊Absolutely no recollection whatsoever of the events.
During the ensuing years, obscure reports of violent and embarrassing stories involving both celebrities and everyday people, began to hit the headlines. Oprah Winfrey was mocked, when she blamed the drug for racist remarks she had made on Twitter. Also alleging to be affected by the medicine, was Chris Pratt who challenged WWE star Dave Bautista to a fight.
An airplane was forced to make an emergency landing, when one passenger who had used the drug to alleviate their fear of flying, physically attacked the cabin crew. Further accounts portrayed hotel rooms being destroyed, patients facing domestic violence charges and all manner of peculiarities.
Until you've personally experienced such an episode, I can understand how hard it would be to accept the deniability that is warranted in what has been dubbed "The Ambien defence". This is unlike other instances of amnesia such as that caused by alcohol, where it's possible that remnants of events can return in drips and drabs with time. It's not like the effects felt from benzodiazepines, barbiturates, anaesthetics, opiates, Ketamine or just getting messed up, or overindulging.
The truly terrifying business effectively steals your body for a period of time, to do absolutely anything with and you can never know. "Body snatching".
Manufacturers Merck were making obscene profits from their product, maintaining that it was a "very rare side effect". In truth, many people were either too embarrassed to report anything, or were simply unaware that anything had befallen them, besides a full night's sleep.
Initial reports that did become public, were considered funny due to how bizarre it sounded. As time progressed, the more problematic nature of sleep eating, having (potentially involuntary or forceful) sex whilst unconscious, sleep cooking and even sleep driving, offered an indication of where this was heading.
Then one day when I searched the internet for the latest news concerning the matter (which usually led with a selection of rehab and detox facilities), everything had changed. Suddenly, the first results the search engine churned out were for lawyers. Finally after nearly 2 decades, the other foot had fallen... a terrible disaster I had foreseen all those years before had come to pass. It was truly like some kind of horror movie. Patients using the drug had awoken to discover the person they loved and that loved and trusted them most in the world -their soul mate - was dead. Butchered by them in utterly heinous ways. Scientists had investigated this "very rare side effect" and discovered that everything that we had been saying was true. Thus it's now become an accepted alibi in defence of crimes, where it could be proven the phenomenon was in effect.
However, the important thing to keep in mind is that whether a court of law accepts this alibi or not, that person still has to live each day for the remainder of their life, imagining that terror and suffering they inflicted upon their trusting partner. To my mind, such a sentence is a fate worse than death.
Just a link
Aaaaaaaaaasszqez Just a link because I didn't want to make objectionable posts in public. So here it is.. The results...
-
Dr. Harold Shipman (Dr . Death) Harold Shipman was an English general practitioner. With an estimated 250 victims, he is considered to be...
-
🟩 Friday 10th May 2024 Imagine you're an orange ( Coping with rejection ) 🍊 Imagine you're an orange. A perfectly good, ripe, j...




















































.jpeg)

