After Life 

  On more than one occasion, I have experienced heart failure and was medically resuscitated. I don't tend to discuss my experiences, because I'm not in the habit of trampling over the beliefs (comforts and reassurances) of others. For the majority of people, death is the great unknown- something that nobody can ever describe with any guarantees of accuracy. Thus, having faith in an afterlife offers some hope that the spirit will continue after the physical body expires, decays and decomposes. If this concept provides comfort and reassurance to those who believe in it and it causes no harm, who am I to deride such ideas and deprive an individual experiencing possibly the single most terrifying episode of this life, a modicum of peace in a theory that essentially harms nobody?

   For those who are open to an alternative explanation, I will relate my experiences here, along with a brief discussion of the most commonly held ideas about the mysteries that occur in the event of our death. I am happy to answer any questions you may have, to listen to reported experiences of others and to engage in a discussion of any ideas I raise in this article.

   Firstly, I wish to establish the following facts. On no occasion has there been any "white light", voices calling, or loved ones beckoning to me from the beyond and I did not find myself looking down on my physical body from above. There was darkness. Black, silence. Emptiness. Nothingness. Something worth noting is that arriving in this state after being in a state of extreme pain and trauma, all that was gone. I sometimes describe it as a state of "bliss" and I have spoken to others who have described it in remarkably similar terms.

    Returning to consciousness, I will honestly say that I was furious. While it had been a place of nothingness, there had been no desire to leave and return to this life, with all the chaos and pain, where normality reigns. Those same people who had described their time in the void, had those exact same feelings of anger at being forced to return to reality.

    It's been suggested that I might simply not have been "gone" for sufficient time, to meet with the other worldly occurrences so frequently detailed by believers. I don't deny that this could be a possibility, although the most recent incident caused such extensive hypoxia (lack of oxygen to the brain), that upon waking, I had literally lost all motor function and comprehension of language. In fact, the reason I regained consciousness was because the doctor was removing the ventilator, as once the body regains the ability to breathe independently, such equipment must be withdrawn. So, to my thinking, if that's not sufficient time to have the full experience, I doubt it ever would be.

  I'm aware that there are theories that upon physical death, the brain is flooded with DMT. This is a hallucinogenic substance which occurs naturally in the brain (and in nature, within a large number of species and environments). It's believed to play a major role in the dreams that occur during sleep. As such, it's not impossible that a large quantity of DMT might cause hallucinations in the mind, during a NDE (near death experience). It's also not outside the realms of possibility that already having a degree of familiarity with accounts of others, that their own hallucinations might be of a similar nature.

   It's important to bear in mind how the human brain often allows us to see the very things that we want to see. We are constantly discovering new and astonishing examples of the immense power this organ wields over the body. More complex than any computer, relatively little understood by the finest neuroscientists, much of its capabilities remain a mystery to this day.

   Yet concerning the concept of an afterlife, with around 120 billion people having passed from this life, might it not be rather crowded? What of our animal friends? Why would we be entitled to this eternal existence and they are not? Imagine the struggle for space under those circumstances. Are we to trust in the notion of both a heaven and a hell? In which case, who decides whether each individual meets the required criteria? Are the Muslims correct in their beliefs? Or the Jews? Perhaps it's the Buddhists? Maybe it could even be the Scientologists?

   Providing such peace of mind to the millions of frightened people, each and every one of whom know the day will come, when they will stand at the edge of the great abyss, is a very profitable business. As hard as they try and as many trillions of dollars are thrown at it, there's no cheating death. But one certainty remains. That is how we all have the opportunity to make the best we can of our time here, in this world. Our experiences, values, perspectives and goals will undoubtedly vary, but to a greater or lesser degree, we have some control over the direction out lives will take. Don't waste this, depending on an uncertainty in a future that may not be ours to behold.

    Tuesday 10th January 2023

   Grenfell's legacy.

   Since the tragic tower fire in Grenfell exposed how badly its residents were failed, Scottish lawmakers have introduced additional measures to protect people there from the dangers of fire and carbon monoxide leaks. Many residential areas - especially those around the inner city which are frequently home to a less affluent population - made up of typically older properties, that may not be quite as well maintained as they otherwise would be or  could be.

   Scotland has long been campaigning to claim her independence from the United Kingdom. Legal, Judicial, educational, medical, procedural and fiscal systems very often differ from those in English, Northern Ireland and Wales. 

New requirements mean Scotland will be the first country in the UK  to legislate for such vital, life saving equipment across the board. Another claim those petitioning for national independence can proudly disport. The use of early warning devices in the home, for businesses and in public places saves lives. The statistics are undeniable and they've proven to be so successful, that many insurance providers deem them a necessity to obtain cover.

   Every home will be required to install an interlinked system, meaning when one alarm is triggered and sounds, every device will sound, wherever you are in the property. This system is connected using radio frequencies and doesn't require wi-fi to function. Kitchens will need a heat detector, smoke detectors must be positioned in the most commonly used space (usually a living room), in every hallway and landing and if there are any carbon fuelled appliances, that room will need a carbon monoxide detector (although the latter need not be interlinked). Landlords, local authorities or housing associations will be responsible for equipping rental properties. 

Building regulations demand that  newly built properties, extensions and loft conversions include the provisions. Homeowners will probably find mortgage and insurance providers insist upon compliance. Anyone who has ever had to make a claim against their insurance policy, will appreciate how unlikely they were to be successful, if not adhering too a legal stipulation. It's not an excessive expense given that the operational lifespan is about ten years, reducing the potentially steep human price tag. However, the treasury will be providing the fire service with the necessary finances to assist those most at risk. Loans will be made available to social landlords (local authorities and housing associations) as they will probably need to fit a large number of properties within a limited amount of time.

  Although it is not currently a criminal offence to not have the correct devices fitted, using the interlinked system, it would not be possible to sell the property and local authorities can use their statutory powers, to require work on substandard housing. Undoubtedly should a court of law have to ascribe responsibility following injury, disability or loss of life, any failure to comply with minimum legal standards would be a deciding factor. Systems may be powered by long life lithium batteries or mains powered (with a back up battery). Reusable batteries cannot be used and batteries must be in a sealed, tamper proof unit. The systems are widely available, although the government does not endorse any particular manufacturers. They do however detail specific safety standards with which each device must conform, akin to the CE mark that indicates a standard for toys.

   The UK has been amending legal requirements for providers of rental properties and in building regulations, but this is the first inclusion of the interlinked system within legislation. 

These  groundbreaking measures are a response to the notorious Grenfell tower disaster in 2017. Tower fires are utterly terrifying and (fortunately) a horror few people will ever have to know.

Shortly before 1am on 14th June 2017, a ferocious blaze tore through a 24 storey tower block in Grenfell, Kensington, West London. 74 lives were lost that day and 70 more people received hospital treatment for their injuries, in what was the UK's worst residential fire since WWII and the devastating fires of the blitz. 

The entire nation watched in shock, as the tower was rapidly engulfed, burning for 60 hours. Firefighters were unable to reach many of the victims before they were overwhelmed by smoke, or their exit was made inaccessible. They battled the flames for 17 hours before they could reach the top floor. That no more people perished is a testament to the  efforts of police and firefighters, who worked tirelessly under impossible conditions, gaining control after 24 hours.

A full, formal inquest investigated a catalogue of concerns raised by residents prior to the tragedy. There had been only one staircase to serve all 129 flats. It had been more than four years since any  safety checks had taken place. Many fire extinguishers were inoperable having expired whilst others were marked with the word Condemned. Rubbish had been allowed to amount in corridors, there was only one entrance and a single exit with no sprinklers at all. 

As far back as 12 years prior to the disaster, a report had criticised emergency lighting at Grenfell tower.

Just 12 months before their demise silenced them, residents Nadia Choucair(33) and Mariem Elgwahry(27) had complained after an independent assessor identified 40 serious issues with fire safety in the high-rise. They were threatened with legal action by K.C.T.M.O.; an organisation described described as an "evil, unprincipled, mini-mafia" by the Grenfell Action Group, accusing them of ignoring health & safety laws, saying that: "only a catastrophic event will expose the ineptitude and incompetence of [KCTMO]" adding that they  "predict that it won't be long before the words of this blog come back to haunt the KCTMO management and we will do everything in our power to ensure that those in authority know how long and how appallingly our landlord has ignored their responsibility to ensure the health and safety of their tenants and leaseholders. They can't say that they haven't been warned!".

An electrical fault with a refrigerator on the fourth floor being identified as the source of the fire holds little significance in light of the litany of failures that elicited a perfect storm during the early hours of that June morning. 

Heavy, airtight fire doors and thick walls were intended to contain a fire until fire crews could address it, in which case only residents in the affected unit needed to be alerted or evacuated. Most of Grenfell's 600 occupants were asleep at that hour. Without any kind of warning, they had no way to know the danger they were in until it was far too late. An over-reliance on these features is employed at Grenfell and in buildings the length and breadth of the country, with standard procedures advising occupants to "stay put". Would you feel happy remaining inside a building as the flames are licking at your windows?

Many more lives were lost than should have been, primarily due to the aluminium composite rain screen cladding that had been fitted to the exterior two years earlier in an attempt to improve energy efficiency - or that's where the blame came to a rest anyway.

Harley Facades; the construction company responsible for applying this facia stated that "from a selfish point of view", his company's preference was to use cheaper aluminium Composite material. An alternative cladding with better fire resistance was refused due to cost. High-rise tower blocks are overwhelmingly inhabited by  

72 victims of uncaring policies, punishing the poor 

highly flammable cladding and an air gap beneath it, incurring the stack effect essentially fanning the flames of what had by then, become an inferno. Emergency services were alerted shortly before midnight, when witnesses were woken by residents shouting and screaming for their lives. Accounts of people throwing children from windows and tying bedsheets together to make their escape, make for grim reading. More than anything, the speed with which the smoke and flames took control, shocked everybody. Traumatised survivors told reporters that no alarms had sounded. It's yet ANOTHER example of the lethality presented by capitalist pragmatism. Persistent demands to impose more and more cost cutting measures puts profits before safety and the lives of people. 

The government immediately demanded a public enquiry and I can personally attest to witnessing hundreds of tower blocks nationwide, being stripped of exterior cladding. 

  The Grenfell tower disaster:

How the Grenfell fire unfolded

 ⚠️Video timeline of the Grenfell tower inferno: Watch as 24 floors are gutted within half an hour, by a real-life raging inferno.Keep in mind that parents trapped in their homes on the upper floors, had no other option than to hold their kids, knowing in their hearts how it was the end for each and every one of them.⬇️

Remembering the victims.

🗣️Leave a comment. I read every one and will reply if requested to do so.